![]() ![]() Larger ISP providers such as Comcast still have the same over network utilization issues despite higher higher revenue from said area over all these years. Very nice influx of new ISP subscribers for larger ISP companies whilst smaller ISP companies like Windstream that were in the area for years are losing subscriber counts. The only time when any residents in the area will see Comcast come out with their trucks is when there is a outage and even then it typically takes from 24 hours to 72 hours for service to fully come back. Common areas with severe network over utilization have never been address by providers lke Comcast but they'll happily expand user base of their services in the same area. I use to live in Sugar Land(suburbs look Houston area) which is a pretty well off area with very strong job growth, standard of living is higher than most of Houston and has been for decades now, the ISP quality of service has stagnated for decades there as well. ![]() For starters they could construct more nodes in areas where they " Know" they have high bandwidth access around the clock, there are lots of areas that only have two or three options for ISP services that the consumer can choose from and the ones with the strongest advertising campaign tend to have the highest amount of network utilization causing poor QoS and packet loss on a daily basis. While I did state they have the revenue available to remedy the QoS issues such as network over utilization, I've never made the statement money fixes all so don't lump me into the group of people you have under that category. As most these people are busy "fixing" the bitching customer that refused to assist rebooting their own router.Īgain money doesnt magically fix everything. In this area the 3 major ISPs are hiring each others outside plant on a pay per job to assist with they back log of installs or fiber deploy. No matter how much money you put into it it takes time.Īnd back to the hiring enough men, again, good outside plant techs are in very short supply. There is a lot of work and design that goes into upgrading or designing a network. But blaming every fucking issue on being greedy is just ignorance. Is there corruption in ISPs, no shit, same with many other businesses. Yeah cities have prelaid fiber but you do realize that it only supports so many connections? How about they had a grant or only enough room in the conduit for 24 count fiber and now all strands are in use making it harder to expand? Did you take that into account? No.Īnd please explain in detail what these QoS issues are and how they can be resolved with money? I mean you seem like you know the networking side and how money fixes everything. Yeah I still dont believe this "gentleman who works for comcast" I've talked to a gentlemen I know on discord who works as a Comcast onsite contractor and he's hinted at negligence from Comcast to maintain stable service or improving service in general due to corporate funds being *redirected elsewhere*. ![]() US ISP companies are falling behind other countries more and more every passing year. A company hires appropriate people to handle decision making and task handling to get things done.Ī lot of fiber in major cities that have stagnating internet improvements already have pre-laid fiber, you can name a hundred different tasks that ISP companies have to deal with in order to provide better or even stable quality of service to the consumer but the fact of the matter is large ISP companies neglect to fix QoS issues because they can afford to do so and it draws more revenue overall at the moment. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |